In this article
The Mental Capacity Act (2005) is a vital piece of legislation designed to protect and empower individuals who may lack the mental capacity to make certain decisions about their own care and treatment. It provides a legal framework to ensure that decisions are made in their best interests while safeguarding their rights and promoting autonomy as much as possible. The Mental Capacity Act (MCA) only applies to people aged 16 and over.
There are many reasons why a person may be judged as lacking capacity. Some examples are listed below, although it is important to be aware that just because a person has one of these health conditions, this does not automatically mean they lack capacity.
- Dementia
- Severe learning disabilities
- Severe brain injuries
- Severe mental health conditions
- Strokes
- Being unconscious, e.g. following an anaesthetic or a sudden accident
For caregivers, understanding and applying the MCA is essential for providing compassionate, informed and lawful care. This primer offers a foundational overview of the MCA, explores the core principles of the MCA, offers practical guidance to help caregivers navigate the complexities of supporting individuals with reduced capacity and provides resources for further learning and support.
Key Principles of the Mental Capacity Act
The Mental Capacity Act has five key principles:
- Principle 1: A presumption of capacity.
- Principle 2: The right to be supported when making decisions.
- Principle 3: An unwise decision cannot be seen as a wrong decision.
- Principle 4: Best interests must be at the heart of all decision-making.
- Principle 5: Any interventions must be with the least restriction possible.
Presumption of capacity
Principle: Every adult is presumed to have the capacity to make their own decisions unless it is proven otherwise.
This principle emphasises that capacity should not be assumed to be lacking just because someone has a mental illness, disability or age-related condition. The default position is that individuals can make their own decisions unless an assessment determines they lack the capacity to do so for a specific decision.
Caregivers and professionals must not assume someone cannot make decisions simply because of their diagnosis or appearance. For example, just because a person has been diagnosed with dementia does not mean they do not have the capacity to manage their own money. Instead, caregivers and professionals should presume the person has capacity and assess their capabilities only if there are clear reasons to doubt capacity for this specific task. If they demonstrate an understanding of their financial situation and how they are spending their money, they should continue managing their own finances.
If there is doubt about a person’s capacity, a formal assessment should be conducted but the starting point is always that they can decide for themselves.
Individuals should be supported to make their own decisions
Principle: A person must be given all practicable help before anyone treats them as not being able to make their own decisions.
Before determining that someone lacks capacity, every effort should be made to assist them in understanding and making decisions. This may involve providing information in simpler terms, using visual aids, involving interpreters or allowing extra time. They might need to communicate in ways that the individual can best understand, such as through gestures, pictures or assistive technology.
For example, if medical professionals recommend that a person with a learning disability requires surgery, rather than automatically deciding that they do not have the capacity to make the decision, doctors and caregivers must first try to help the individual understand the procedure and its risks. They could use visual aids, break down the information into simple terms and give the person extra time to process the details. If, after these efforts, they can understand, retain and weigh the information, they should be allowed to make their own decision about the surgery.
Right to make unwise decisions
Principle: A person is not to be treated as lacking capacity simply because they make an unwise decision.
The MCA recognises that people have the right to make decisions that others may think are risky or unwise, as long as they understand the consequences. Making a decision that appears imprudent or unconventional does not mean the person lacks capacity.
Caregivers must respect a person’s choices even if they personally disagree with them. As long as the individual understands the risks and consequences of their decision, their capacity to make that decision should not be questioned. For example, a person may choose to spend their savings in a way others consider irresponsible, but that alone does not indicate a lack of capacity. If the person fully understands the consequences of their spending, their right to make this decision should be respected.
Best interests must be at the heart of all decision-making
Principle: Any decision made or action taken on behalf of a person who lacks capacity must be done in their best interests.
When someone lacks capacity, any decision made on their behalf must focus on what is best for that individual. This principle ensures that the person’s preferences, feelings and prior choices are considered. It also means that family, friends or other relevant individuals may need to be consulted to make a well-rounded, thoughtful decision.
Caregivers and professionals must involve the person as much as possible in the decision-making process, even if they cannot make the final decision themselves. In making decisions, the person’s past and present wishes, their values and any previously expressed preferences (such as an advance directive) should be taken into account. Family members or others who know the person well should be consulted where appropriate and all factors relevant to the person’s well-being should be considered.
For example, if a person with advanced dementia can no longer communicate their preferences regarding treatment and is deemed to lack capacity, their caregivers and medical professionals should make the decision in their best interests. They should consider what the individual would have wanted based on past conversations and beliefs, discussions with family and any advanced care plans or written wishes. They would also consider the impact of the treatment on the person’s quality of life.
Least restrictive option
Principle: Any decision or action taken on behalf of a person who lacks capacity should aim to restrict their rights and freedoms as little as possible.
If a decision is made on behalf of someone, it should interfere with their personal rights and freedom as minimally as possible while still addressing their needs. The least restrictive alternative should always be chosen when making decisions.
Caregivers must consider all available options before taking actions that might limit a person’s liberty or independence. Alternatives should be sought that maximise the individual’s freedom and autonomy before resorting to a more restrictive approach.
For example, if an individual needs assistance managing their finances, steps should be taken to support them in retaining as much control as possible, rather than taking away their financial independence altogether. The decision should strike a balance between ensuring the person’s safety and allowing them as much autonomy as possible.
Assessing Capacity
Assessing an individual’s mental capacity is a critical process that ensures their rights are respected while safeguarding their well-being. The Mental Capacity Act outlines a clear process for assessing whether someone can make a particular decision at a given time.
Capacity refers to a person’s ability to make a specific decision at a specific time. Capacity is decision-specific, meaning a person may have the ability to make some decisions (e.g. choosing what to wear) but not others (e.g. managing their finances). Capacity can also fluctuate due to various factors, such as illness or medications. Capacity is not static. It can change depending on the individual’s circumstances or the complexity of the decision. For example, someone may lack the capacity to manage their finances during a period of acute illness but regain the ability later.
When assessing capacity, caregivers should follow a structured approach to determine whether an individual can make a specific decision:
- Understand: Can the person understand the information relevant to the decision? For example, can they comprehend the risks and benefits of a medical procedure?
- Retain: Can the individual retain that information long enough to make a decision? While they don’t need to remember it indefinitely, they should hold on to it long enough to weigh it up.
- Weigh: Is the person able to weigh the information and balance the pros and cons to come to a conclusion? For example, can they compare the benefits and risks of treatment options?
- Communicate: Can the individual communicate their decision in any way, e.g. verbally, through gestures or with assistive technology? A person doesn’t need to speak if they can convey their choice through other means.
Documenting the assessment process is essential to ensure clarity and accountability. Caregivers must keep accurate records of the questions asked, the individual’s responses and the rationale for determining whether the person has capacity. These records may be needed to justify actions taken on behalf of the individual, especially if there are legal or family disputes. Comprehensive documentation supports a transparent process and shows that the assessment was conducted fairly and in line with the MCA.
In complex or borderline cases, it is important to seek input from qualified professionals such as doctors, psychologists or social workers. This is particularly important when the decision involves significant consequences (e.g. life-saving treatments or safeguarding issues) or if there are doubts about fluctuating capacity. Collaborating with healthcare professionals ensures a thorough and balanced capacity assessment. These professionals can provide clinical evaluations that improve understanding of the individual’s condition and the impact it may have on their decision-making abilities.
Making Decisions in the Best Interests of Individuals
It is important to keep in mind that just because a person lacks the capacity to make some types of decisions (e.g. complex financial decisions), it doesn’t mean they lack capacity and should be denied the right to make other decisions, such as personal and medical decisions. Caregivers and professionals should carefully assess the person’s capacity for each decision separately, not make broad assumptions about their overall ability to make decisions.
When an individual is assessed as lacking the capacity to make certain decisions, it becomes the responsibility of caregivers and professionals to make decisions on their behalf in line with the Best Interests Principle of the MCA. This ensures that decisions are made with the individual’s welfare and preferences at the forefront.
When making decisions on behalf of an individual, it is important to consult people who know the individual well, such as family members, close friends and healthcare professionals. These parties can provide valuable insights into the person’s past decisions, preferences and values. For example, a family member might know that the individual has strong feelings about a particular type of medical treatment.
Even if the individual cannot express their wishes in the present, it is essential to explore their known values, cultural beliefs, religious views and previously expressed preferences. For example, if someone consistently voiced their preference to live at home rather than in a care facility before losing capacity, this preference should weigh heavily in decision-making.
A multidisciplinary team (MDT) consisting of healthcare professionals, social workers, therapists and caregivers can provide a holistic view of the individual’s needs. Each professional brings different perspectives – medical, psychological and social – that ensure all aspects of the individual’s well-being are considered. By working together, the MDT can address the person’s medical, emotional, social and ethical needs. This collaborative approach also helps prevent any one perspective from dominating the decision-making process and ensures a balanced view of what is in the person’s best interests.
Decisions made in an individual’s best interests should not be static. People’s conditions and circumstances can change, so it’s important to regularly review previous decisions to ensure they still align with the individual’s current best interests. Since capacity can fluctuate, especially in cases of mental health conditions or degenerative diseases, it is essential to reassess capacity periodically. A person who previously lacked the capacity to make a decision may regain it under different circumstances (e.g. after recovering from an illness or stabilising with medication). On the other hand, a person who was previously deemed to have capacity may need to be reassessed at a later date as their condition progresses.
Even if an individual has limited capacity, they should still be encouraged to express their preferences as much as possible. Their feelings, wishes and partial decisions should be factored into the final decision. Caregivers should actively involve them in discussions to the extent they are able to participate.
If an individual is unable to fully express their wishes or if they have no family or friends to advocate for them, access to an independent advocate, such as an Independent Mental Capacity Advocate (IMCA), is essential. Advocates help individuals communicate their preferences and ensure their voice is heard in the decision-making process.
Resources for Caregivers
Navigating the Mental Capacity Act can be complex and caregivers must be well-informed and supported to effectively uphold the rights and best interests of the individuals they care for. Access to training, guidance and support networks is vital to ensure caregivers are equipped with the necessary tools and knowledge.
Below are key resources and approaches that can assist caregivers in their responsibilities.
Training and workshops
Ongoing education and training are crucial for caregivers to develop the skills and knowledge needed to assess mental capacity and make decisions on behalf of individuals who lack it. Training courses provide practical strategies for understanding the MCA and its application in real-world settings, including how to carry out best interests decisions. Similarly, workshops can offer interactive learning experiences, where caregivers engage in discussions, case studies and role-playing exercises to improve their capacity-assessment techniques and decision-making processes. These sessions can also offer clarity on legal rights and responsibilities under the MCA.
Official guidance
Caregivers should regularly consult official resources provided by government bodies or health organisations to stay updated on the latest guidelines and best practices related to the Mental Capacity Act. Official publications and toolkits can provide caregivers with structured, legal and practical frameworks for decision-making. Example resources include:
- The UK Government’s MCA Code of Practice
This comprehensive document explains the MCA’s legal framework and offers practical advice for caregivers on capacity assessment, decision-making in the best interests of the individual and using advanced decisions. - NHS Guidance
The NHS provides additional resources and explanatory documents tailored for both professionals and caregivers that offer insights into healthcare decisions under the MCA.
Support networks
Joining support networks, both online and in person, can provide caregivers with the opportunity to share experiences, ask questions and learn from peers who are dealing with similar challenges. These networks can be invaluable for emotional support and practical advice. Caregivers often face stress and isolation and connecting with others in similar roles can help alleviate some of this burden and provide emotional support. Additionally, caregivers can exchange tips and strategies that have worked for them when dealing with specific MCA-related issues. Some support networks that can be beneficial include:
- Carers UK: A national charity offering forums, helplines and resources for caregivers to help them stay connected and supported.
- Carers Trust: Carers Trust offers 24 hours a day support for carers aged over 18. They also offer an online community for young carers, parent carers and older carers.
- Online Forums: Platforms like Facebook groups or dedicated caregiving forums can provide quick access to advice and experiences from others who are navigating the MCA.
Familiarisation with the legal frameworks surrounding the Mental Capacity Act can empower caregivers to handle complex decisions with confidence. Knowing the law helps caregivers navigate situations where an individual’s capacity is in question or when disputes arise over best interest decisions.
Caregivers can access free or low-cost legal advice from organisations such as Citizens Advice. These bodies provide guidance on how to handle MCA-related issues, such as capacity disputes or when to apply for Court of Protection orders. Independent mental capacity advocates (IMCA) can also be helpful, as they are a statutory service that provides advocacy for individuals who lack capacity and have no family or friends to represent their interests. Caregivers can consult an IMCA when making key decisions, especially in healthcare and safeguarding matters.
Conclusion
Navigating the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) is a vital responsibility for caregivers working with individuals who may lack the ability to make informed decisions. The MCA provides a clear legal framework to protect the rights and dignity of these individuals and ensure that decisions made on their behalf are in their best interests and the least restrictive of their autonomy.
By understanding the Act’s principles, conducting thorough capacity assessments, engaging in collaborative decision-making and drawing on available resources, caregivers can provide compassionate, respectful and legally compliant support.
Ultimately, the goal is to uphold the individual’s dignity and preferences and promote their independence while safeguarding their well-being. Caregivers who take the time to learn and apply the MCA will not only comply with the law but also improve the quality of care and respect for those they support.
Mental Health Act
Just £20
Study online and gain a full CPD certificate posted out to you the very next working day.